I just
can’t imagine doing this, so I always try to explain it away by telling myself
that the details of their reluctance are just left out. That they dithered and
hesitated and asked him, “But who will take care of…?” And, indeed, who did
take care of? Someone had to. Jewish Law is very clear about that, with its
insistence on providing for widows and orphans and all its rules about marriage
and patrimony, which governed how one’s children would be provided for after
they left home. Jesus himself, as he was dying, transferred his responsibility
for his mom as firstborn to his best friend John.
I always
have wondered why his younger brothers—James, Joseph, Judas, or Simon (Mark
6:3)—didn’t look after Mary after Jesus’ death. While they are decidedly
skeptical of Jesus’ divinity and purpose early on (John 7:5), that doesn’t mean
they were necessarily scumbags, and at least one of them, James, later became a
leader in the early church. Why didn’t they assume care for their own mom?
The
closer I look at it, the more familiar it all looks to me. Siblings unequally
invested in the care of their aging parents. Perhaps fighting about it, as many
families do. “Don’t you see I have my own family to take care of?” I can
imagine Simon or Joseph railing. Or Judas or James saying to Jesus, “It’s all
very well for you to talk about Mom’s needs. You don’t have anyone else who
needs you. You don’t even have a job!”
And those
men who followed Jesus. In their twenties or thirties, probably, as he was.
Surely married by then and fathers. Employed. Landowners perhaps.
But, as
Peter points out, “We have left everything to follow you!” (Mark 10: 28).
Everything they had. Everything they cared about until that moment, when a
wifeless, childrenless, fieldless, homeless man beckoned. How did they convince
themselves to do that? And how did they feel about it after they did?
And what
happened to the families they left behind to follow Jesus? There’s
virtually no mention in the gospels of the wives and children and fields and
aging parents that Jesus commends his disciples for leaving behind (Mark
10:29).
Anyway,
that’s what I’ve been thinking about as I read about Jesus gathering up his
followers from around where he lived. What that would have meant.
This has always fascinated me, too. I know that God asks everyone to follow him but Jesus' words seem more like a command - Follow Me! - not Follow me? Did Jesus command everyone he encountered to follow him - or only those that he knew would do it? Did life as Jesus' disciple mean that they were completely unable to spend time at home or working? Is it possible to not follow Jesus after he commands us? Is that what we read at the end of Luke 9 or do those men indeed follow him - after a bit of coaxing by Jesus?
ReplyDeleteEnd of Luke 9 (57-62 NIV), in case anyone needs help:
ReplyDeleteAs they were walking along the road, a man said to him, “I will follow you wherever you go.”
Jesus replied, “Foxes have dens and birds have nests, but the Son of Man has no place to lay his head.”
He said to another man, “Follow me.”
But he replied, “Lord, first let me go and bury my father.”
Jesus said to him, “Let the dead bury their own dead, but you go and proclaim the kingdom of God.”
Still another said, “I will follow you, Lord; but first let me go back and say goodbye to my family.”
Jesus replied, “No one who puts a hand to the plow and looks back is fit for service in the kingdom of God.”